"A Government of the People, by the People, for the People"

The Republic of the United States is in its greatest danger since the Civil War. Extremist have taken over a major political party and are wreaking havoc on our nation. These radicals and their accomplices in the main stream media are trying to portray all dissent as racial or objection to health care. They are neither. The tremendous outcry is for freedom.

The new slavery will be economic. It will transcend all races. We will have a country of those who pay taxes and those who do not. When the majority of Americans are in the latter group free elections are a thing of the past.

Those who have no idea what is happening are supporting an agenda that will destroy our nation. When this comes about they will scream in protest but there will be no one left to listen.

In 1953 Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev uttered these words, “We will bury you. We will defeat America without firing a shot”. It was the joke of the age. It was further discredited with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989.

Unknown to us the Soviets had placed agitators among us. The riots of the 1960's and 1970's were the direct result of their policies. We the People successfully defeated this attempt at violent overthrow. We went about our daily lives and forgot about those nasty times.

Those that participated in the violence did not. They infiltrated key institutions throughout the land and became respectable. They then began the takeover of our major institutions, colleges, news media, government, and a political party. An economic storm has placed them in a position that they have aspired to for nearly a half a century. They are now close advisors to the President of the United States.

This condition has been perpetuated by the President who places unvetted "czars" at the highest levels of government with the sole purpose of transforming the United States. The President has bypassed all checks and balances that the Constitution provides.

The Democrats in both houses of Congress have betrayed the trust of the American People. One Congressman stated that they follow no rules and make them up as they go. Another Congressman stated that the Healthcare Bill was passed to control the people. A vast majority of the people wanted some heath care reform, (nearly 80 percent of us). But 65 percent of us did not want this bill. Yet a President and a Political party forced it upon us.

We as a People must stand up to this threat. We must support the millions of Democrats who believe in freedom. We must assist them in returning their party to the political center.


The Democrats neither wrote nor read the bill they inflicted upon us. They are irrelevant. The seats they occupy do not belong to the Democratic Party anymore than the Republican seats belong to the Republican Party. They belong to the American people and not the highest bidder.

If we do not stand up for freedom no one else will. Do not let us become what our Ancestors escaped.

ARE “BIRTHERS” JUST CRAZY, OR WHAT?

I would proudly call myself a "Birther," yet,

I believe Obama is, or was, a U.S. citizen. But he provides no credible proof of this.

I believe he was probably born in Hawaii. But no one has provided proof of this.

I don't believe he was born in Kenya. But there is no proof of that, either.

I have sworn, as has Obama, “to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” So, this drives my inquiry

But the likelihood that this man is a "natural born citizen," as required by the Constitution, is very, very unlikely. He does not appear to meet the legal tests of "jus soli" AND "jus sanguinis” in a unified way.

The term jus sanguinis describes a person born of parents who are citizens and jus soli describes a person born in the country. There was no "Unity of Citizenship" at the time of his birth to make him a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This is a specific category of citizenship UNDER OUR FUNDEMENTAL LAW. One must be natural born to be President. Dual citizens cannot be natural born. Such has been a requirement of the U.S. Constitution since the beginning of the Republic.

Inasmuch as Barrack’s father was a British subject at the time of his birth, he cannot be a "natural born citizen." Further, his mother was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship (at least 5 years over the age of 14). Gone jus sanguinis! Hence, not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, maybe only a U.S. citizen, which is NOT ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT.

In addition to that, he was later adopted and renamed by a foreigner, Lolo Soetoro, when he was a child, and undoubtedly lost his U.S.citizenship then, which he may have gotten under the principle of "jus soli."

He was at one point a citizen of Indonesia, a country that required proof-certain of his Indonesian citizenship. Otherwise "Barry Soetoro" could not have attended school there. This adoption probably stripped away his American citizenship entirely, requiring it to be restored through a legal process, if it ever was. Also, there should have been a legal name change, of which no one can produce a record. These loose ends could be problematic. The consequense could be nullification of every order, proclaimation and law promulgated during Obama’s term as “President.”

An ugly fact here is that Barrack Obama has spent well over a million dollars, much of it taxpayer money, to obstruct access to the truth about his birth, background and eligibility. We do not even have credible evidence of his hospital birth in Honolulu. Why is that? People in Hawaii understandably would like to celebrate the details of his birth, but credible details are “hazy.”

Why are so many documents, which go to the issue of his citizenship, hidden or lost? Why can we not know his true identity? Why would he ever allow his election campaign operatives publish such an amateurish forgery of his "birth certificate" on the internet? Why will he not quickly assure us that he is truly a natural born citizen?

Regardless of all these legal twists and turns, Obama will not provide a skeptical America with a genuine record of his birth or legal and academic past, documents that, if exposed, would cause him enormous embarrassment and legal difficulties. The exposure of these documents, which will inevitably come out, may also cause a Constitutional crisis, and a market nightmare for the country, if the timing is off. A bad thing for a man claiming to love transparency.

Our Founding Fathers placed this requirement for (only) the President to be a natural born citizen to protect our country from foreign influence. There are some out here who feel a strong foreign influence in the words and actions of this "radical president." Some days it seems like Barack Obama shows a lot more devotion to foreign ideas, such as Marxian Socialism, Islam and world government, than to our Founders' American ideals of individual liberty, private property and limited government. That is why the examination of Obama's most untransparent past is so compelling.

"Actions Speak Louder Than Words"

The only agency of the United States Government that has ever created more wealth than it has destroyed is the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA). The innovations developed from this single agency touch our lives in ways that most cannot imagine. From the preparation of our food, to the clothes we wear, from communication to transportation the list is endless.

A man of great foresight stepped forward to lead a nation. He dared us to be great. His vision became our dream. John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) said, "We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too."

His words electrified a nation. We were in the midst of a recession and many were in far worse condition than today. The people of that time lived within their means and did not expect a government handout. JFK cut taxes and unleashed the great machine of capitalism. We embarked on one of the greatest adventures of all time. From the young to the old all were mesmerized by seven explorers that dared to venture into the unknown. The seven original Mercury Astronauts were like the knights of old in a new Camelot. President Kennedy told us, "the growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains."
Why did John Kennedy take us to the moon? "Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, "Because it is there."
"Well, space is there, and we're going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked."

That day in 1962 at Rice University, JFK stepped into the world of history as a man of great vision and a great leader. He placed no energy into driving an agenda. He drove a dream.

It has been forty-eight years since John Kennedy gave that speech. We now have a new leader. Another man of great intellect now leads the nation into a new frontier. His vision is the exact opposite of Kennedy's. Where JFK was bold Barack Obama (BO) is faint. Where JFK dared BO cringed. Where JFK drove a dream BO drove an agenda.
The greatest generator of capital created by a Government, NASA, has been hobbled. A man lacking vision has instead saw fit to pursue an agenda. He has taken the assets of NASA and decided to use them to monitor the environment of good old planet Earth. Even though the religion of man made global warming has been proven to be a progressives fairy tale BO has spoken. He has taken the greatest race horse the world has ever known and chained it to a plow.

I do believe that a mans actions speak far louder than his words.

DON'T BASK, DON'T SELL

Of all the wrongheaded measures Obama and the Democrat majorities in Congress have tried this year, they are about to impose an even more outrageous one: abolishing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in the military. This “workable compromise” has allowed active homosexuals to serve their country in the armed forces with less commotion than usual. But now they insist on the commotion.

“Usual commotion ” caused by homosexuals in military outfits have been well hidden by the dominant left-wing media. And this commotion is real poison!

Every former military commander, including myself, can tell stories about how a few sexual deviants can utterly destroy unit cohesion, morale and discipline. Once in the open, everything ugly is now unleashed in a tight military setting: sexual imposition, mental cruelty, bribery, open sodomy in the barracks, envy, blackmail, disease, false accusations, conduct unbecoming officers, brutal assaults and 20 other crimes become exposed, but not often reported.

The unity in a fighting command can be destroyed by open homosexuality in the ranks. Rank is primarily the reason why.

There is a mighty big difference between a private and a sergeant; between a lieutenant and a major. There are 23 distinct ranks (from E-1 to O-10) in most branches of service. In some settings, a person only one rung above you can order you to your death. That person above you can make your life easy, or a living hell.

Sexual imposition on the part of a superior usually leads to living hell.

“Well, you knew I was gay, why did you invite me in?”

On the flip side, false charges from underlings and “righteous victims” have ruined many a career. Havoc and mutiny are not unheard of when lower ranking men and women refuse unnatural advances.

And rumors, both true and false, can change esprit de corps to “esprit de corpse” (pun intended).

The mission of our military is to defend our country by winning wars. Or providing a show of power, which prevents war. Social engineering to make homosexuality “moral and accepted,” if ever possible, is way second.

We already have a cacophony of “discrimination” cases bogging down our military missions. Everyone who is not a tall, athletic, Caucasian, white male has a case.

Will we now add everyone who is not a tall, athletic, Caucasian, white, heterosexual male?

In the future, will any officer who alludes to a problem with homosexuality be the equivalent of General Patton smacking a coward?

When the rule “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is changed, regardless of what euphemistic name it is given, it will especially emphasize “don’t dare ask” without Mirandizing the entire outfit. As far as “tell,” there will be plenty of that in your face. Count on it.

“Yes, me and my subordinate are in a lesbian relationship, sir.”

“Now, are you going to make trouble for me on my next fitness report?”

If enacted, the new rules will have to involve major revisions in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which has served so well for many generations. Further, our military chaplains will all have to be retrained in what is morally right, regardless of what Bible or Koran has taught them. Political correctness and Cultural Marxism will get a big boost.

And our military, as with all American institutions, except central government, will grow weaker.

To many in the military, the inevitable “sensitivity re-training” on Homosexual Rights in the Military will be like a Marxist re-education camp. Enlistments and re-enlistments will fall. And our true military missions will be further weakened for the sake of a “politically correct” agenda.

After this “homosexual transparency” is pushed, expect a rash of billeting quarrels, transfer requests, distrust, false rumors, barracks violence, AWOLs and desertions. Then, an increase in lawsuits, phony “hate crimes,” and all manner of Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Military clubs will appear, along with more gay enlistments.

Why is such action needed, other than to pander to a militant (but hardly military) homosexual agenda? Does the current regime actually want a breakdown in our national security and another dose of chaos to help destroy America?


-Aircaptain February 23, 2010